"The will and passion to achieve much more and much faster is extremely welcome," he remarked.
What is the new United Kingdom energy strategy?
Will the UK's energy policy be successful?
How much nuclear electricity does the United Kingdom use?
How much may my energy expenses increase?
The government said that it will modify planning laws to reduce approval timelines for new offshore wind farms, with the goal of having wind power account for more than half of the UK's renewable capacity by 2030.
The policy pledges to consult on forming agreements with "a restricted number of supportive towns" who wish to host wind turbines in exchange for guaranteed lower energy prices for onshore wind.
However, the strategy states that there would be no "massive revisions" to present onshore wind planning restrictions.
Despite being one of the least expensive kinds of energy, new onshore wind projects have been dropping since 2015, when the government halted subsidies and implemented tougher planning requirements in response to concerns that wind turbines were unsightly and noisy.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson defended the choice not to prioritize onshore wind, claiming that the UK already has around 30GW of onshore wind power.
Speaking at the Hinkley Point C nuclear power project, he claimed onshore wind farms were "controversial" because of their aesthetic effect and future sites "would have a very high bar to cross".
Mr Johnson said the approach was about "tackling the faults of the past and making sure that we are positioned properly for the future".
He claimed the government was "already doing a significant lot to help people with the immediate cost of living, and of course we are going to do more," citing programmes such as a £6 billion energy efficiency fund and funding for heat pumps.
However, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer criticised the policy as "too little, too late" to assist individuals facing growing expenses.
"All we've got today is a jumbled list of things that could and should have been done over the previous 10 to 12 years, and it doesn't even address very critical things like insulating houses, which could save everyone £400 on their bill," he added.
It "did not serve the requirements of people or the climate," according to Green Party co-leader Adrian Ramsay.
Mr Ramsay argued that if the government was "serious about energy bills and implementing meaningful climate action, it would be moving much farther on onshore wind".
The measures were criticised as "utterly useless" by Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey, and a "lost opportunity" by SNP leader Stephen Flynn.
"Most of these decisions will take a long time to have an impact, and in the near run we will continue to be dependent on fossil fuels," former Ofgem chief Dermot Nolan warned.
He added the lack of attention on energy efficiency, on insulation, on increasing the quality of people's houses "is a chance squandered".
"This is an urgent problem that requires immediate answers, and this has no effect on pricing," said Dr Simon Cran-McGreehin, head of analysis at the Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit.
"It makes some efforts to improve energy supplies, but they are largely medium to long-term solutions. So it appears to fail the exam question "He continued.